Brad’s Note: Just a couple of weeks ago, we launched the Intelligent Options Advisor. It’s managed by me and Stephen Hester, who authored today’s article. One of the reasons I partnered with Stephen is his expertise across sectors and asset types.

That’s why I confidently told everyone it would prove to be a true all-weather income strategy. And I wasn’t kidding.

Our first option trade is up over 70% – and it’s not even two weeks old. Compare that to the S&P 500, which is only up 5.6% in the same time frame.

Now, while that trade is no longer actionable, Stephen is putting the final touches on a new trade alert set to go out this Friday. If you’d like to get involved before the trade details go live, go here.

And in today’s article, Stephen uses his expertise to show how he ties different areas of the market together. What he has to share today might surprise you…

When I oversaw alternative investments for two $100 billion firms, I often saw normal clients make the same mistake as a lot of average investors. They’d go with the status quo, and I wasn’t in a position to convince them otherwise. It was my job to analyze and select the best alternative investments, but the rest was their financial advisor’s responsibility.

Just like those normal clients, most Americans follow the 60/40 model – this is the status quo I referenced earlier. That’s 60% stocks and 40% bonds. We’ve all heard of it. Odds are you or part of your family’s retirement savings use this strategy.

The idea is stocks are for growth, and bonds provide principal protection and income. For those closer to retirement, the normal suggestion is to own long-term municipal or U.S. government bonds.

Many people, even licensed financial advisors, call U.S. government bonds “risk free.”

But they aren’t risk free. Far from it.

I would know; I’ve had multiple securities licenses for most of the past 15 years. And today, I’ll show you why most bonds aren’t as safe as the 60/40 model would have you believe. That 60/40 model might even work most of the time. But when it doesn’t, it’s a painful experience not every investor can recover from.

Understanding the risks of these “risk-free” investments today could save your portfolio from huge losses.

How Bonds Can Decline in Value Over Time

The chart below shows two popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) over the past year: the iShares 20+ year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY).

One is down 15.3% and the other 34.9%. Guess which exclusively owns “risk-free” government bonds?

And if you think nearly 35% losses are bad, consider that TLT is down nearly 45% from its highs in Q3 of 2020.

Millions of investors believed their government bonds would “save them” in a stock market correction, like we went through over the past couple of years. Instead – as you can see above – they declined in value more than stocks. A lot more.

That’s because bonds are priced based on simple arithmetic. As interest rates rise, a fixed-coupon bond must decline in value to compete in the marketplace with new bonds offering higher interest rates.

Let’s say you own a 20-year bond with an annual coupon rate of 2%. That’s how much income an investor can expect every year while holding a bond.

Two years later, rates have risen, and bond priceshave moved in the opposite direction. So that same bond commands a 4% coupon.

What’s your bond worth now? Exactly $0.74511 on the dollar, or just under 75% of the original value.

So you see why long-dated bonds and the ETFs that own them are suffering.

Now, I know we’ve recommended government bonds in the past at Intelligent Income Daily. Specifically the Series I Savings bond. Those are different because they can be redeemed at any time after one year for full value, so there is no risk of loss due to price changes. There are also strict limits on the amount of Series I Savings bonds investors can buy.

But the TLT ETF only yields a little over 2% today, and that’s after the share price has declined by nearly 45%. And you can’t swap it out with a different investment. Do that, and you’ll have to absorb all those unrealized losses just like a bond ETF or mutual fund investor.

If you own the bonds outright instead of through an ETF or mutual fund, you can choose to hold to maturity.

Very few people do that, however, as they lose diversification and transaction costs may be high.

So if you don’t want to purchase individual bonds, avoid bond ETFs that decline in the face of rising inflation, and still make income in the markets… what should you do?

The Income Solution

Fortunately, there’s a way to protect against inflation and obtain reliable income. Many of our current top picks not only paid steady dividends but increased them throughout the pandemic and the Great Recession.

The first company we recommended in the Intelligent Options Advisor, for example, has increased its annual dividend for 29 straight years.

There are other solutions to this problem within the broader fixed income bucket. That’s what the wealthier clients did at the large firms I used to help manage. They avoided long-term bonds and allocated more to certain types of stocks and “alternative income” investments.

Ares Capital (ARCC), the largest company in its sector, currently yields 9.8%. And this is no sucker yield. ARCC is a $10 billion market cap company and managed by the best of the best. When others were struggling, ARCC paid that sky-high dividend throughout the pandemic.

ARCC is one of many “alternative income” investments that many investors have never heard of, but we’ve been following for many years.

And we’ll continue to target investments like that to boost our income streams and outperform the broader markets… with a lot less risk than traditional “risk-free” investments.

Happy investing,

Stephen Hester
Analyst, Intelligent Income Daily