Hot dogs and hamburgers: You don’t get much more American than that.

Yet it’s hamburgers that clearly stand out in the fast-food space thanks in part to three companies that have dominated for decades. There’s undisputed ruler McDonald’s (MCD), Burger King – which is owned by Restaurant Brands International (QSR) – and then Wendy’s (WEN).

Of course, that list has expanded immensely over the years. Five Guys, Shake Shack, Culver’s, Whataburger, and numerous regional chains all now compete for the same customers – not to mention those upstart Chick-fil-A cows constantly telling you to eat chicken instead.

All of this has taken a toll on the original three, as has inflation. Consumers in general have become more value conscious. And many believe (probably accurately) that while prices keep rising, the quality and quantity of menu-ordered food have fallen.

This mentality has affected restaurants across the board. But Wendy’s has especially lagged. That much is evidenced by the latest round of publicly traded hamburger earnings, where:

  • Burger King’s U.S. comparable sales increased 8.5%.

  • McDonald’s increased 0.8%.

  • Wendy’s declined 7%.

That’s quite a spread.

Burger King surprised most of us even though everyone knew it’s been investing heavily in improvements. Much of that money went into remodeling, updating, and advertising. But it also upgraded its Whopper, from the bun to the mayo to the packaging.

In comparison, McDonald’s earnings were barely worth reporting. Yet the company still has enormous scale that should never be taken lightly.

As such, it can easily experiment with menu offerings, including new drinks and chicken products. And more importantly, McDonald’s has purchasing power and advertising muscle, with more money to spare afterward.

So while the company might have experienced a slower quarter, I remain very impressed with where it’s at and what it’s capable of achieving still.

But Wendy’s?

Well that company is a different story altogether.

Wendy’s isn’t bankrupt, but…

Wendy’s is in a tight spot, and everyone knows it.

The company’s global systemwide sales fell 6.5% last quarter, including an 8.2% decline in the U.S. In short, traffic is down and franchisee economics are under pressure.

Fortunately, Wendy’s got a new CEO in May, Bob Wright; and he’s proving to be refreshingly direct. He’s acknowledged the company’s unattractive reality and outlined achievable goals going forward, including improvements to:

  • The menu

  • Restaurant operations

  • Digital operations

  • The actual buildings.

Of course, that all requires capital – which the company also acknowledged it’s short on. It’s hard to have hordes of money when you’re not making hordes of money.

This isn’t to say Wendy’s is bankrupt, mind you. For the first half of the year, it generated about $160 million of operating cash flow and $120 million in free cash flow – the latter of which was an improvement over Q2-25.

However, Wendy’s net leverage ratio is around 5x with no real near-term improvements forecasted. And it has about $430 million of debt maturing in March 2028. While it hopes to refinance this by early next year, that amount is still dragging down its balance sheet.

With all that in mind, Wright has decided to slash Wendy’s quarterly dividend in half from $0.14 per share to $0.07. This alone should free up more than $50 million per year, and Wright says he also doesn’t expect to repurchase shares this year.

If you’ve been with Wide Moat Research for even a few weeks, you probably know how strict we are about recommending safe dividends. At the same time, as I wrote on August 12, we want to see corporate payouts make sense.

And it makes absolutely no sense to keep paying dividends when your larger business is struggling so badly.

Source: ChatGPT

Where’s the beef, Wendy’s?

Wendy’s unquestionably has brand value.

In fact, Dave Thomas built one of America’s most recognizable restaurant brands. The red-haired Wendy’s logo is outright iconic.

Likewise, its “Where’s the beef?” question of the 1980s became one of the most famous advertising slogans in history.

But fame doesn’t automatically create the kind of wide business moat investors should want to see. Not if it doesn’t result in strong:

  • Customer traffic

  • Same-store sales

  • Franchisee profitability

  • Margins

  • Free cash flow

  • Returns on invested capital

  • Balance-sheet strength

  • Dividend growth.

Can Wendy’s reclaim all of that? That is the question Wall Street is asking right now.

If it can, that would make now quite the buying opportunity.

As illustrated below, Wendy’s is trading at approximately 7x price to free cash flow. Its normal multiple, meanwhile, is much closer to 21x.

Source: FAST Graphs

But that discount is for a reason, and not just because of the facts I already laid out. FAST Graphs forecasts around -22% free cash flow movement for Wendy’s this year… and another 15% decrease next year.

Sure, the 30% rebound it expects in 2028 sounds great. But that’s hardly around the corner and anything but guaranteed.

Bob Wright and his Wendy’s team will have to stabilize traffic to make that happen, restore the company’s value proposition, improve franchisee economics, and rebalance its balance sheet. That’s a lot to achieve.

And while they could pull it off, they also might not. So, ultimately, I just don’t think it’s worth betting on this gamble.

That was my professional opinion before rumors of a buyout broke last week. And it remains my professional opinion today.

As I said yesterday – and countless times before – I don’t buy companies just because they might be acquired. I buy them because their value propositions appear profitable over the long term.

McDonald’s still comes out on top

With that in mind, I’d much rather own predictable businesses like McDonald’s.

Yes, its second quarter didn’t wow. But it combines the previously mentioned global scale and cost-of-capital advantages with one of the most powerful restaurant real estate platforms ever built.

Approximately 95% of McDonald’s restaurants are franchised, with franchisees paying rent and royalties based on restaurant sales. McDonald’s itself describes this model as being designed to produce stable and predictable revenue and cash flow.

That’s how the fast-food chain generated about $10.4 billion of rental revenue last year. And it made another $6 billion in royalty revenue.

Then there was its approximately $22.8 billion of net property and equipment associated with franchise arrangements, including $7.1 billion of land.

Now that's a powerful moat.

Wendy’s may be cheaper, but price and value simply aren't the same thing. So, for my money, I have to go with the Golden Arches.

Wendy’s could still offer the thrill of victory. But with McDonald’s, I’m far less worried about the agony of defeat.

Happy SWAN investing,

Brad Thomas
Editor, The Wide Moat Daily